Hire Conversion Rate Optimization Experts With U.S. Support
Hire Conversion Optimization Developers at SoftDoes — vetted, senior engineers backed by a U.S. delivery team. Start with one, scale to a full team.
Senior Conversion Optimization Engineers
Only vetted developers with 5+ years of experience.
24h Candidate Match
Receive the first matching profiles within one business day.
Delivery Team Included
We provide a complete delivery team to ensure results.
Hire remote Conversion Optimization Developer
Discover developers that match your project requirements.No exact match for this specialty yet — here are related experts from our network.
Principal DevOps / Site Reliability Engineer with 14+ years of software engineering experience (including freelance development) and 9+ years of professional DevOps/SRE experience. Expert in designing and automating scalable cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP, Azure, a company Cloud, with deep expertise in Kubernetes, Docker, OpenShift, Terraform, Ansible, GitOps (ArgoCD/FluxCD), CI/CD, Go, and Python. Experienced in building multi-cloud, high-availability platforms, infrastructure automation, cloud migrations, and developer platforms. Currently working as Principal Engineer at FOX, previously held senior engineering roles at Hippo Insurance, a company, and Morgan Stanley.
I am a solutions architect and engineer with 5+ years of experience in designing and implementing cloud-based AI solutions. Solid skills across applied AI, software engineering, cloud architecture and DevOps practices, built on years of field experience, allow me to drive AI initiatives from concept to production, leveraging AI tools to boost delivery speed without compromising on deliverable quality.
Senior Python Developer with 11+ years of experience designing scalable backend systems and microservice architectures across data analytics, logistics, and fintech platforms. Proven track record leading engineering teams and delivering cloud-native solutions on AWS and Kubernetes. Recently led development of AI-powered and real-time observability platforms using modern Python frameworks and large-scale data technologies. Strong background in system architecture, distributed systems, and mentoring teams in Agile environments.
Senior AI/ML Engineer with 10+ years of experience designing and deploying large-scale machine learning and generative AI systems in production environments. Specialized in LLM architectures, agentic AI systems, distributed ML infrastructure, and end-to-end MLOps platforms. Proven track record of delivering high-impact AI products including diagnostic AI systems improving accuracy by 38% and enterprise ML platforms accelerating data pipelines by 40%. Experienced in leading cross-functional teams, architecting scalable AI platforms, and driving AI innovation across healthcare, enterprise analytics, and automation domains.
10+ years in IT, 7+ years focused on DevOps/SysOps/SRE. Currently - Tech Lead at a U.S. company.
AI engineer with 6+ years of professional experience, available to start a new challenging role in stimulating and innovative company.
Over the past 8 years, I have gained ample experience in ETL/ELT, Snowflake, Airflow, and Data Warehouse. I have been responsible for Data Lake Support and creating new ETL/ELT processes within AWS using either Snowflake, Glue, Airflow, dbt, Xplenty, Docker, or Custom Python Scripts with APIs. I have also worked as an Application Architect, which includes over 50 different services across AWS. I needed to create pipelines, organizations, and permissions within AWS Infrastructure to meet business requirements while optimizing costs. My previous work includes over four years as a Data Analyst, creating and supporting BI Tools like Sisense, Quicksight, and Power BI/Tableau. I managed and created dashboards, widgets, and Data Architecture with Sisense and Redshift. I was also the Support Engineer for Sisense Installation and Maintenance. I would describe myself as reliable and able to undertake complex situations with unique solutions. I have over 7 years of experience in the Data sector, over 17+ years of SQL experience, and 20+ years as a Developer. I’m also a mid-QA Automation Engineer, which gives me a better idea of the attention to detail a developer needs to attain to complete development within the time limit and without affecting PROD releases. My other skills include being a Sysadmin in both Windows and Linux environments, a company Web Services AWS, a company 365 Portal, JumpCloud, 1Password, and Slack. I also have DBA knowledge, including creating servers and Data Warehouses. I'm an expert in MS Office and can automate with macros. I’m also a Cybersecurity advocate since I’m always looking for ways to protect data and user permissions. I have been in Agile Development with Jira in Kanban and Scrum for the past 4 years. And I have also created bots to automatize process alerts and configurations with Slack APIs and AWS to help my teammates get prompt feedback from the ETL pipelines.
I am a technical leader and problem solver who designs and delivers scalable, distributed software and AI systems that create measurable business value. I have led cross-functional teams and platform initiatives, translating complex requirements into reliable, production-ready solutions built on open standards. My experience spans architecting, mentoring, and driving execution across diverse technology stacks, with a strong focus on operational excellence, product impact, and long-term system sustainability.
Energetic, adaptable, mission-focused and multilingual MBA professional with more than 20 years of experience in IT, Business Intelligence, Marketing and Finance in 4 multinationals. Proven track record of finding creative solutions to solving challenges. Effective presenter who collaborates well in teams and across divisions. Passion for learning and acquiring new skills every day.
15+ years of experience designing and operating large-scale distributed systems and latency-sensitive production platforms. Expertise in multi-region Kubernetes infrastructure, hybrid cloud environments, and production reliability engineering, with a strong focus on scalability, fault tolerance, observability, and operational automation. Deep experience building and operating hybrid bare-metal and cloud platforms (AWS, GCP), including Kubernetes infrastructure, traffic routing, CI/CD systems, and production observability stacks supporting globally distributed workloads. Strong background in incident response, Linux systems, networking, distributed systems troubleshooting, and infrastructure automation using Terraform and Python. Focused on end-to-end ownership of production infrastructure platforms while partnering closely with engineering teams to improve reliability, security, deployment consistency, and operational efficiency.
Technical leader at a company AI Core, building and operating cloud-native AI platform services from prototype to production. Hands-on across backend engineering, distributed systems, and Kubernetes, driving technical direction and delivery across teams without direct authority.
Software Engineer with 10+ years of AI/ML experience and proven expertise in developing LLM-powered applications, generative AI systems, and ad engines. Strong track record of scaling ML platforms from inception to 1,500+ users at a company, building production AI systems, and creating innovative ad solutions. Experienced in full software development lifecycle with deep knowledge of PyTorch, TensorFlow, and modern AI frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph, and various LLM APIs.
What our Conversion Optimization Developers
can build

Which Engagement Model Is Right For You?
Whether you need one engineer, ongoing delivery support, or a complete product team, we have an engagement model that fits.

Strengthen your existing engineering team with senior specialists who integrate seamlessly into your workflows while you retain full ownership of priorities, roadmap, and day-to-day management.
- Senior engineer(s) integrated into your team.
- Fast onboarding into your workflow.
- Flexible monthly engagement.
- Replacement guarantee if needed.
- Direct communication and full transparency.

Ideal for teams that need experienced engineers backed by technical leadership, ensuring faster onboarding, predictable execution, and consistent delivery without adding management overhead.
- Dedicated senior engineer(s).
- SoftDoes delivery oversight.
- Regular technical and delivery check-ins.
- Optional code reviews and QA support.
- Escalation management.
- Replacement support.
- Flexible team scaling.

Launch products faster with a ready-to-work cross-functional team that brings together the right expertise from day one, helping you scale without the complexity of hiring each role individually.
- Engineers, QA, Designers, PMs, Tech Leads - assembled to fit your project.
- Cross-functional collaboration.
- One engagement structure and one point of contact.
- Easy scaling up or down.
- Team continuity throughout the project.

Not sure which engagement model fits?
Or maybe you don't want to manage engineers at all.
- End-to-end project ownership.
- Dedicated Project Manager.
- Engineering, QA, Design, and Product expertise.
- Delivery planning and sprint management.
- Quality assurance throughout development.
- Transparent communication and regular progress updates.
- One accountable partner responsible for successful delivery.


Not sure which engagement model fits?
SoftDoes takes full ownership of delivery, combining project management, engineering, design, and QA into one accountable team focused on successful outcomes.
FIND THE
RIGHT expert, FASTER
Choose a role. Filter by technology.
Discover developers that match your project requirements.
Hire developers by role
Hire developers by tech stack
Hire developers by industry
What we do for you
From sourcing and vetting to onboarding and ongoing support, we handle the entire process so you can focus on building products instead of managing hiring.
$14.5 /per hour
- Personal Recruitment
- Payroll Management
- Time Management & Reports
- 24 Support
- Free Trial
Unbeatable Transparent Pricing Model.
Work with senior-level engineers through a clear and scalable engagement model built for modern teams. No hidden fees, long hiring cycles, or unpredictable outsourcing costs — just vetted talent, flexible collaboration, and full operational transparency from day one.
Whatever your Conversion Optimization challenge, we've solved it before
Whether you're scaling your team, modernizing an application, or accelerating product delivery, our React engineers become an extension of your team from day one.
Great engineering talent, simplified.
Remote developers - interviewed, verified, and ready for you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about working with SoftDoes. Can’t find an answer?
How long does it typically take to hire developers with proven Conversion Optimization expertise?
Timelines vary with how you source, but the pattern is consistent. Standard outbound recruiting, posting a role and screening resumes yourself, typically takes several weeks to a couple of months before you have a confirmed hire, largely because conversion optimization resumes are hard to verify without a technical interview. Working with a delivery partner that maintains a pre vetted bench of specialists compresses this dramatically, since the technical screening has already happened before you ever see a candidate. Most companies using a vetted network can move from initial conversation to a working specialist in a matter of days rather than months, without sacrificing quality or skipping proper evaluation.
What does it cost to hire a developer or team with deep Conversion Optimization expertise?
Cost depends heavily on seniority, engagement model, and location. A junior or mid level specialist handling straightforward A/B tests costs less than a senior hire designing multivariate experiments and building custom tracking infrastructure. Hiring a full time in house employee brings salary, benefits, and overhead on top of base pay, while a dedicated remote specialist or pod typically comes at a lower total cost because you avoid that overhead while still getting senior level output. The right comparison is not hourly rate alone but total cost against the revenue impact of a properly run testing program, since a specialist who ships even a modest lift in conversion rate usually pays for their engagement many times over.
What engagement models are available for Conversion Optimization projects, such as a dedicated hire, a pod, or a contract?
Engagement models generally fall into three categories. A single dedicated specialist works well when you need one experienced person embedded in your team, handling test design, implementation, and analysis independently. A pod, a small coordinated team, fits companies that need to cover more surface area at once, such as running tests across multiple product lines or markets simultaneously, without managing several individual freelancers. A project based contract suits a defined scope, such as auditing an existing funnel and delivering a prioritized roadmap. Flexible providers let you start with one model and shift to another as your testing program matures and your needs change over time.
How do you ensure time zone alignment with a team skilled in Conversion Optimization?
Time zone alignment starts with choosing a delivery partner or candidate whose working hours overlap meaningfully with your own team, since conversion optimization work depends on close collaboration with product, design, and engineering throughout the day, not just asynchronous reporting. A North America focused partner naturally solves much of this problem by staffing specialists who work hours compatible with US and Canadian business schedules. Beyond raw overlap, look for a team that documents test hypotheses, results, and decisions clearly in shared tools, so progress remains visible and actionable even during the hours when your team and the specialist are not both online at the same time.
How does SoftDoes technically vet developers for Conversion Optimization expertise?
SoftDoes vets Conversion Optimization specialists through a structured technical process rather than a resume review alone. Candidates work through practical exercises involving real funnel data, identifying where the largest drop off occurs and proposing a specific, testable hypothesis to address it. Evaluators probe statistical reasoning directly, including when a test has reached significance, how sample ratio mismatch happens, and when multivariate testing is appropriate versus a simple two variant test. Candidates also walk through past experiments, including ones that failed, to demonstrate genuine hands on experience rather than memorized theory. Only specialists who clear this technical bar join the talent network that clients draw from for new engagements.
What support is available for scaling the team after launch as our Conversion Optimization needs grow?
Support does not end once a specialist is placed. As your testing program proves its value, SoftDoes can add specialists to form a full pod, covering more of the funnel at once or extending coverage to additional product lines and markets. If a specialist is not the right fit, a replacement guarantee ensures a qualified alternative steps in quickly without a prolonged gap in your testing cadence. The same delivery relationship that got you your first hire scales smoothly to a broader engagement, so growing the team never means restarting the sourcing and vetting process from scratch each time you need additional capacity.
How to Hire Developers Skilled in Conversion Optimization
Too many companies hand conversion optimization to a generalist marketer or a junior developer, then wonder why traffic keeps pouring into a funnel that never improves. The gap between a team that guesses at page changes and one that runs disciplined, statistically sound experiments is the difference between flat revenue and a growth engine that compounds month over month. Conversion Optimization, often shortened to CRO, demands a rare mix of data literacy, engineering skill, and product judgment. This guide walks you through defining the role, sourcing real expertise, vetting candidates properly, and building a team that ships measurable results.
What Conversion Optimization Really Means and Why It Matters to Your Bottom Line
What a Conversion Optimization Specialist Actually Does Day to Day
In production environments, Conversion Optimization is not a single task but a disciplined, repeatable process applied across a live product or marketing site. A specialist blends statistics, product thinking, and hands on implementation to turn existing traffic into more revenue without spending another dollar on acquisition. Core responsibilities include:
- Running structured A/B tests on high traffic pages, and holding the discipline to wait for statistical significance before declaring a winner, since stopping a test early because one variant looks ahead is one of the most common ways teams draw the wrong conclusion from real user data.
- Conducting funnel analysis across the entire purchase or signup flow to identify the exact step where the largest percentage of users drop off, then concentrating optimization effort there first instead of spreading small, unfocused changes evenly across every page.
- Reviewing session recordings and heatmaps to see where users actually click, scroll, and hesitate on a page, often uncovering that an ignored call to action is a layout or clarity problem rather than a copy problem a rewrite alone would fix.
- Designing multivariate tests that evaluate several page elements simultaneously and measure how they interact, reserving this approach for high traffic pages since it requires substantially more visitors than a simple two variant test to reach a reliable conclusion.
- Building segment based personalization that shows different messaging or offers to first time visitors versus returning customers, because the two groups are making fundamentally different decisions at different points in their journey and one generic experience underserves both.
- Tracking micro conversions such as email signups, add to cart actions, and video plays alongside the primary conversion goal, since these smaller signals reveal where a change is working before it shows up in revenue, and auditing page load speed, since ignoring technical performance while only testing copy leaves measurable gains on the table.
The Business Case for Investing in Real Conversion Optimization Expertise
Hiring a specialist rather than assigning the work to whoever has spare time changes the outcome in ways that show up directly on the balance sheet.
- Compounding revenue growth: a specialist who runs valid tests and ships winning variants continuously stacks small percentage gains across every stage of the funnel, and because conversion improvements apply to existing traffic, the return compounds without any added spend on acquisition.
- Fewer costly mistakes: an experienced hire understands sample ratio mismatch, the technical bug where the actual traffic split diverges from the intended split, and catches it before it silently invalidates a test result leadership might otherwise act on with confidence.
- Faster, more confident decisions: when testing methodology is sound, product and marketing leaders stop debating opinions about a page and start acting on evidence, which shortens the review cycle for every future landing page, pricing page, or checkout change.
- Technical performance gains that pay for themselves: a specialist who treats page load speed as part of the optimization program, not a separate concern, uncovers conversion gains that a copy and layout only approach would leave sitting on the table indefinitely.
Preparing Your Organization Before You Start Hiring
Getting Clear on What You Actually Need Before You Post a Role
Before writing a job description or reaching out to a delivery partner, get specific about the scope, seniority, and structure of the hire you actually need. Skipping this step is the single biggest reason companies end up with a mismatch between the specialist they hired and the work they actually needed done.
Define the Scope and Architecture Before You Hire
Map exactly where conversion optimization work will touch your stack. Will the hire work inside your existing analytics and experimentation platform, or do you need someone to help select and implement one first? Does the role cover the marketing site, the product signup flow, in app upgrade prompts, or all three at once? Companies running high traffic ecommerce or SaaS funnels need someone comfortable working alongside data engineering, and this often overlaps with broader business analytics work, since reliable experimentation depends on clean, trustworthy data pipelines feeding every test and every dashboard leadership reviews.
Matching Seniority Level to the Complexity of Your Stack
Conversion Optimization spans a wide range of seniority, from a coordinator who can set up simple two variant tests to a senior specialist who designs multivariate experiments and builds custom event tracking. Match the seniority level to the complexity of your traffic and your existing tooling. A company running a handful of landing pages needs a different skill set than one operating a multi step checkout across web and mobile with millions of monthly sessions. Consider complementary stack knowledge too, including analytics platforms, tag management, feature flagging, and basic frontend development, since a specialist who can implement their own test variants moves faster than one who depends entirely on engineering.
Choosing Between an In House Hire and a Dedicated Remote Pod
An in house hire makes sense when conversion optimization is a permanent, full time function tightly woven into your product roadmap and you have the management bandwidth to support one specialist long term. A dedicated remote pod, a small team that already works together, fits companies that need to move fast, cover more ground than one person can, or are not ready to commit to a permanent headcount. A pod also solves the coverage problem when a single hire goes on leave or leaves the company, since the delivery partner absorbs that risk instead of leaving your testing program stalled indefinitely.
Writing a Requirement Profile That Attracts Real Experts
A standout requirement profile does more than list tools. It gives a serious candidate enough context to self select in or out before the first call.
- State the technical mission plainly: explain what the specialist will actually own, whether that is lifting checkout completion rate, improving signup conversion, or building a testing program from nothing, so candidates understand the mandate rather than reading a vague list of buzzwords about growth.
- List the exact ecosystem and tooling in use, including the experimentation platform, analytics stack, tag manager, and any feature flagging system, so a serious candidate can assess fit immediately and you filter out applicants who only have experience with unrelated tools.
- Describe team dynamics honestly, including who the specialist reports to, which teams they partner with such as product, design, and engineering, and how much autonomy they have to prioritize their own test roadmap versus executing requests handed down from stakeholders.
- Explain the system level impact expected, meaning how test results feed into product decisions, whether winning variants ship immediately or wait for a release cycle, and how success is measured beyond a single test, such as cumulative lift over a full quarter.

Let’s Turn Your Idea into Scalable Software
Book a call with the representative to get answers to all the questions you may have.
Finding, Vetting, and Onboarding the Right Team
How to Source and Vet Conversion Optimization Talent Properly
Most companies default to generic outbound recruiting, posting a job description and hoping a qualified specialist applies. That approach works, but it is slow and it surfaces a wide range of skill levels that all look similar on paper. A faster, more reliable path pairs standard sourcing with pre vetted talent networks that already carry a proven Conversion Optimization track record, cutting the time spent screening candidates who cannot back their resume with real testing methodology or a defensible statistical approach.
Where to Actually Find Qualified Candidates
Standard outbound recruiting, posting to job boards and reaching out on professional networks, casts a wide net but forces you to screen every resume yourself, and conversion optimization resumes are notoriously hard to verify since almost anyone can claim they ran A/B tests. A more efficient route is working with a delivery partner that maintains our talent network of specialists who have already been technically screened for real experimentation skill. This shortens time to hire significantly and lets your team spend interview time confirming fit rather than teaching basic testing concepts to someone who claims senior experience.
Vetting That Goes Deeper Than a Resume or Portfolio
A resume cannot show whether a candidate understands why a multivariate test needs far more traffic than a simple A/B test, or whether they would catch a sample ratio mismatch before it quietly invalidates a result. Go beyond the resume with a practical exercise: hand them a real or simulated funnel dataset and ask them to identify the highest drop off step and propose a test. Follow with a short system design conversation about how they would structure an experimentation program, and a few candid questions about a test that failed and what they learned from it.
Onboarding for Speed: A 30/60/90 Day Integration Plan
- In the first thirty days, grant full access to the analytics platform, experimentation tool, and relevant repositories, then have the new specialist audit the current funnel and existing test history before launching anything new. This builds context, surfaces obvious quick wins, and prevents them from repeating a test the team has already run and learned from.
- Between days thirty one and sixty, the specialist should be running their own tests independently, presenting a prioritized backlog based on funnel analysis, and syncing regularly with product and design so proposed changes do not collide with unrelated roadmap work already scheduled for the same pages or flows.
- By day ninety, the specialist should own a full testing roadmap, report results in terms leadership cares about such as revenue impact rather than statistical jargon, and be trusted to make independent calls on which tests to prioritize next without requiring approval for every individual experiment they plan to run.
Making the Right Hiring Decision
Red Flags and Green Flags to Watch for in Candidates
Watch how a candidate reasons through methodology, not just what tools they list on a resume.
Red flags:
- They cannot explain statistical significance in plain language, or worse, describe calling a test early because a variant looked ahead. This single habit invalidates results regularly and signals a candidate who chases quick wins over trustworthy, data driven decisions.
- They treat every test as an A/B test and cannot describe when multivariate testing is appropriate or why it needs far more traffic to reach a reliable conclusion, suggesting shallow, memorized knowledge rather than real applied testing experience.
- They focus exclusively on copy and layout changes and have no answer when asked how page load speed affects conversion rate, missing an entire category of measurable gains a well rounded specialist would investigate as a matter of course.
- They cannot describe a test that failed or produced an inconclusive result, which usually means they have not run enough real experiments to encounter the normal, expected failure rate of a healthy testing program over time.
Green flags:
- They immediately ask about sample ratio mismatch and describe how they check that actual traffic splits match the intended split, showing they treat test integrity as a first class concern rather than an afterthought handled by tooling alone.
- They describe using funnel analysis to find the single step with the largest drop off before proposing any change, showing they prioritize impact over simply generating a high volume of unfocused tests across the whole flow.
- They talk naturally about micro conversions such as signups or add to cart actions as early signals of a change working, showing patience and a grasp of how optimization effects surface well before final revenue numbers move.
- They can walk through a session recording or heatmap and explain how it changed their hypothesis about why a call to action underperformed, showing they connect qualitative behavior data to the quantitative test results they design.
Why Partnering with SoftDoes Gives You an Edge
SoftDoes gives North American companies immediate access to senior, pre vetted Conversion Optimization talent without the months long search and screening burden of doing it alone. Every specialist in our network has been technically evaluated for real experimentation skill, not just resume claims, and you work with a coordinated delivery team rather than an isolated freelancer who disappears when priorities shift. Engagements scale from a single specialist to a full pod as your testing program grows, and every hire comes with a replacement guarantee, so a mismatch never becomes your problem to solve alone. Conversion Optimization work often pairs naturally with paid acquisition, which is why teams frequently combine a specialist here with our Google Ads experts to align spend with what the funnel actually converts.
Ready to Hire Conversion Optimization Engineers?
If your funnel has been flat despite constant marketing spend, the fix is rarely more traffic, it is a specialist who can find where users actually drop off and prove what fixes it. SoftDoes can put a technically vetted Conversion Optimization specialist or a full pod in front of your team within days, not months. Schedule a consultation with SoftDoes today to discuss your funnel, your stack, and the fastest path to a testing program that actually moves revenue.

















































