Hire Visual Basic Developers With U.S. Support
Hire Visual Basic Developers at SoftDoes — vetted, senior engineers backed by a U.S. delivery team. Start with one, scale to a full team.
Senior Visual Basic Engineers
Only vetted developers with 5+ years of experience.
24h Candidate Match
Receive the first matching profiles within one business day.
Delivery Team Included
We provide a complete delivery team to ensure results.
Hire remote Visual Basic Developer
Discover developers that match your project requirements.No exact match for this specialty yet — here are related experts from our network.
Principal DevOps / Site Reliability Engineer with 14+ years of software engineering experience (including freelance development) and 9+ years of professional DevOps/SRE experience. Expert in designing and automating scalable cloud infrastructure across AWS, GCP, Azure, a company Cloud, with deep expertise in Kubernetes, Docker, OpenShift, Terraform, Ansible, GitOps (ArgoCD/FluxCD), CI/CD, Go, and Python. Experienced in building multi-cloud, high-availability platforms, infrastructure automation, cloud migrations, and developer platforms. Currently working as Principal Engineer at FOX, previously held senior engineering roles at Hippo Insurance, a company, and Morgan Stanley.
I am a solutions architect and engineer with 5+ years of experience in designing and implementing cloud-based AI solutions. Solid skills across applied AI, software engineering, cloud architecture and DevOps practices, built on years of field experience, allow me to drive AI initiatives from concept to production, leveraging AI tools to boost delivery speed without compromising on deliverable quality.
Senior Python Developer with 11+ years of experience designing scalable backend systems and microservice architectures across data analytics, logistics, and fintech platforms. Proven track record leading engineering teams and delivering cloud-native solutions on AWS and Kubernetes. Recently led development of AI-powered and real-time observability platforms using modern Python frameworks and large-scale data technologies. Strong background in system architecture, distributed systems, and mentoring teams in Agile environments.
Senior AI/ML Engineer with 10+ years of experience designing and deploying large-scale machine learning and generative AI systems in production environments. Specialized in LLM architectures, agentic AI systems, distributed ML infrastructure, and end-to-end MLOps platforms. Proven track record of delivering high-impact AI products including diagnostic AI systems improving accuracy by 38% and enterprise ML platforms accelerating data pipelines by 40%. Experienced in leading cross-functional teams, architecting scalable AI platforms, and driving AI innovation across healthcare, enterprise analytics, and automation domains.
10+ years in IT, 7+ years focused on DevOps/SysOps/SRE. Currently - Tech Lead at a U.S. company.
AI engineer with 6+ years of professional experience, available to start a new challenging role in stimulating and innovative company.
Over the past 8 years, I have gained ample experience in ETL/ELT, Snowflake, Airflow, and Data Warehouse. I have been responsible for Data Lake Support and creating new ETL/ELT processes within AWS using either Snowflake, Glue, Airflow, dbt, Xplenty, Docker, or Custom Python Scripts with APIs. I have also worked as an Application Architect, which includes over 50 different services across AWS. I needed to create pipelines, organizations, and permissions within AWS Infrastructure to meet business requirements while optimizing costs. My previous work includes over four years as a Data Analyst, creating and supporting BI Tools like Sisense, Quicksight, and Power BI/Tableau. I managed and created dashboards, widgets, and Data Architecture with Sisense and Redshift. I was also the Support Engineer for Sisense Installation and Maintenance. I would describe myself as reliable and able to undertake complex situations with unique solutions. I have over 7 years of experience in the Data sector, over 17+ years of SQL experience, and 20+ years as a Developer. I’m also a mid-QA Automation Engineer, which gives me a better idea of the attention to detail a developer needs to attain to complete development within the time limit and without affecting PROD releases. My other skills include being a Sysadmin in both Windows and Linux environments, a company Web Services AWS, a company 365 Portal, JumpCloud, 1Password, and Slack. I also have DBA knowledge, including creating servers and Data Warehouses. I'm an expert in MS Office and can automate with macros. I’m also a Cybersecurity advocate since I’m always looking for ways to protect data and user permissions. I have been in Agile Development with Jira in Kanban and Scrum for the past 4 years. And I have also created bots to automatize process alerts and configurations with Slack APIs and AWS to help my teammates get prompt feedback from the ETL pipelines.
I am a technical leader and problem solver who designs and delivers scalable, distributed software and AI systems that create measurable business value. I have led cross-functional teams and platform initiatives, translating complex requirements into reliable, production-ready solutions built on open standards. My experience spans architecting, mentoring, and driving execution across diverse technology stacks, with a strong focus on operational excellence, product impact, and long-term system sustainability.
Energetic, adaptable, mission-focused and multilingual MBA professional with more than 20 years of experience in IT, Business Intelligence, Marketing and Finance in 4 multinationals. Proven track record of finding creative solutions to solving challenges. Effective presenter who collaborates well in teams and across divisions. Passion for learning and acquiring new skills every day.
15+ years of experience designing and operating large-scale distributed systems and latency-sensitive production platforms. Expertise in multi-region Kubernetes infrastructure, hybrid cloud environments, and production reliability engineering, with a strong focus on scalability, fault tolerance, observability, and operational automation. Deep experience building and operating hybrid bare-metal and cloud platforms (AWS, GCP), including Kubernetes infrastructure, traffic routing, CI/CD systems, and production observability stacks supporting globally distributed workloads. Strong background in incident response, Linux systems, networking, distributed systems troubleshooting, and infrastructure automation using Terraform and Python. Focused on end-to-end ownership of production infrastructure platforms while partnering closely with engineering teams to improve reliability, security, deployment consistency, and operational efficiency.
Technical leader at a company AI Core, building and operating cloud-native AI platform services from prototype to production. Hands-on across backend engineering, distributed systems, and Kubernetes, driving technical direction and delivery across teams without direct authority.
Software Engineer with 10+ years of AI/ML experience and proven expertise in developing LLM-powered applications, generative AI systems, and ad engines. Strong track record of scaling ML platforms from inception to 1,500+ users at a company, building production AI systems, and creating innovative ad solutions. Experienced in full software development lifecycle with deep knowledge of PyTorch, TensorFlow, and modern AI frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph, and various LLM APIs.
What our Visual Basic Developers
can build

Which Engagement Model Is Right For You?
Whether you need one engineer, ongoing delivery support, or a complete product team, we have an engagement model that fits.

Strengthen your existing engineering team with senior specialists who integrate seamlessly into your workflows while you retain full ownership of priorities, roadmap, and day-to-day management.
- Senior engineer(s) integrated into your team.
- Fast onboarding into your workflow.
- Flexible monthly engagement.
- Replacement guarantee if needed.
- Direct communication and full transparency.

Ideal for teams that need experienced engineers backed by technical leadership, ensuring faster onboarding, predictable execution, and consistent delivery without adding management overhead.
- Dedicated senior engineer(s).
- SoftDoes delivery oversight.
- Regular technical and delivery check-ins.
- Optional code reviews and QA support.
- Escalation management.
- Replacement support.
- Flexible team scaling.

Launch products faster with a ready-to-work cross-functional team that brings together the right expertise from day one, helping you scale without the complexity of hiring each role individually.
- Engineers, QA, Designers, PMs, Tech Leads - assembled to fit your project.
- Cross-functional collaboration.
- One engagement structure and one point of contact.
- Easy scaling up or down.
- Team continuity throughout the project.

Not sure which engagement model fits?
Or maybe you don't want to manage engineers at all.
- End-to-end project ownership.
- Dedicated Project Manager.
- Engineering, QA, Design, and Product expertise.
- Delivery planning and sprint management.
- Quality assurance throughout development.
- Transparent communication and regular progress updates.
- One accountable partner responsible for successful delivery.


Not sure which engagement model fits?
SoftDoes takes full ownership of delivery, combining project management, engineering, design, and QA into one accountable team focused on successful outcomes.
FIND THE
RIGHT expert, FASTER
Choose a role. Filter by technology.
Discover developers that match your project requirements.
Hire developers by role
Hire developers by tech stack
Hire developers by industry
What we do for you
From sourcing and vetting to onboarding and ongoing support, we handle the entire process so you can focus on building products instead of managing hiring.
$14.5 /per hour
- Personal Recruitment
- Payroll Management
- Time Management & Reports
- 24 Support
- Free Trial
Unbeatable Transparent Pricing Model.
Work with senior-level engineers through a clear and scalable engagement model built for modern teams. No hidden fees, long hiring cycles, or unpredictable outsourcing costs — just vetted talent, flexible collaboration, and full operational transparency from day one.
Whatever your Visual Basic challenge, we've solved it before
Whether you're scaling your team, modernizing an application, or accelerating product delivery, our React engineers become an extension of your team from day one.
Great engineering talent, simplified.
Remote developers - interviewed, verified, and ready for you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about working with SoftDoes. Can’t find an answer?
How long does it typically take to hire developers with proven Visual Basic expertise?
Through traditional recruiting, hiring an experienced Visual Basic engineer often takes several months, because few active candidates list VB6 or VBA prominently and screening them properly requires technical depth most recruiters lack. Many searches also stall when strong candidates turn out to lack modern C# skills. Working with a pre vetted network changes that timeline significantly. SoftDoes maintains senior engineers already assessed on legacy Visual Basic, COM, data access and migration work, so we can typically present matched profiles within days and have an engineer or pod starting soon after you confirm the fit, depending on your onboarding and access requirements.
What does it cost to hire a developer or team with deep Visual Basic expertise?
Cost depends on seniority, scope and engagement model. A senior engineer who can maintain VB6 and VBA systems while also planning a migration to C# commands a higher rate than a developer who only writes simple macros, but that range of skills usually saves money by avoiding a second hire later. A dedicated pod costs more per month than one specialist, yet it often finishes modernization work faster and with less risk. SoftDoes provides transparent pricing after a short discovery call, once we understand your systems, timeline and whether you need maintenance, modernization or both.
What engagement models are available for Visual Basic projects, such as a dedicated hire, a pod, or a contract?
SoftDoes offers flexible models to match the work. A dedicated engineer suits steady maintenance of VB6 applications or VBA workbooks, where continuity and deep system knowledge matter most. A pod, usually a lead plus engineers with legacy and modern .NET skills, fits staged migrations where stabilization and new development happen in parallel. Contract engagements work well for defined projects such as moving an Access database to SQL Server or preparing macros for 64 bit Office. You can start with one model and switch as needs change, without restarting the hiring process or losing the knowledge your team has built.
How do you ensure time zone alignment with a team skilled in Visual Basic?
SoftDoes focuses on clients across the US and Canada, so we match engineers whose working hours overlap substantially with your core business day. That overlap matters for legacy Visual Basic work, because engineers often need to reproduce issues alongside the business users who own a workbook or application. During discovery we confirm your primary time zone, your release windows and any support expectations, then staff the team accordingly. Regular standups, shared channels and a delivery lead who owns communication keep everyone aligned, so questions about urgent defects or migration decisions get answered the same day rather than waiting overnight.
How does SoftDoes technically vet developers for Visual Basic expertise?
Our vetting goes well beyond keyword matching. Senior engineers on our team interview candidates on real legacy scenarios, including COM registration problems, ActiveX control conflicts, ADO data access and compatibility with 64 bit Office. Candidates complete a practical exercise where they read unfamiliar Visual Basic code, explain the business logic, add characterization tests and outline a staged migration to C# on modern .NET. We also assess how they communicate risk to nontechnical stakeholders. Only engineers who show both legacy fluency and modern .NET skills join the network, so you see candidates who can stabilize and modernize your systems.
What support is available for scaling the team after launch as our Visual Basic needs grow?
Visual Basic needs rarely stay the same. A maintenance engagement often grows into a modernization program once the inventory reveals how many systems depend on legacy code. SoftDoes makes scaling straightforward: you can add engineers with VB6, VBA or modern C# skills to an existing pod, bring in a lead to coordinate a larger migration, or scale down after a milestone ships. Our replacement guarantee means that if an engineer is not the right fit, we provide a qualified replacement quickly. Knowledge stays within the team through shared documentation and overlapping responsibilities, so growth never resets progress.
How to Hire Developers Skilled in Visual Basic
Plenty of companies hire a generalist to "keep the old VB app running," only to watch a fragile macro or VB6 form break payroll, invoicing, or month end reporting with nobody able to explain why. The better outcome is an engineer who reads legacy Visual Basic code fluently, stabilizes what works today, and plans a safe path to modern .NET without disrupting the business. This guide explains what Visual Basic work really involves, how to define the role, where to source proven specialists, how to vet them beyond the resume, and how to onboard them so they deliver value quickly.
What Visual Basic Really Covers and Why It Still Runs Your Business
Where Visual Basic Lives in Production Systems Today
Visual Basic is not one technology but a family of three. Classic Visual Basic 6 (VB6) still powers desktop line of business applications, Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) automates Microsoft Office, and VB.NET runs on the .NET platform. In practice, a Visual Basic engineer spends the day on work like this:
- Maintaining VB6 desktop applications. Fixing defects in forms, modules and class files that run order entry, inventory or billing. The VB6 runtime still works on current Windows versions, so these apps stay in production while companies plan migrations, and someone must keep them correct, secure and deployable.
- Building and repairing VBA automation. Writing and debugging macros, user forms and database connections inside Excel, Access, Word and Outlook. Many finance and operations teams depend on critical workbooks that have no documentation or version control, so the engineer also brings structure, comments and source control to that code.
- Untangling COM and ActiveX dependencies. Diagnosing registration failures, missing controls and version conflicts across COM components and ActiveX controls. These issues surface during Windows upgrades and new workstation rollouts, and they are the most common reason a legacy VB application suddenly refuses to start on a fresh machine.
- Managing data access layers. Maintaining ADO connections to Access databases and SQL Server, tuning queries, and fixing record locking problems. Many older Visual Basic systems store business critical data in Access files on shared drives, and moving that data to SQL Server is often the first stabilizing step.
- Preparing for 64 bit Office and modern Windows. Updating API declarations, replacing incompatible controls and testing macros against 64 bit Office builds. Code that ran for years on 32 bit installations can fail silently after an upgrade, and a skilled engineer catches those breaks before end users do.
- Planning and executing migrations. Inventorying forms, modules and dependencies, then converting VB6 to VB.NET or C# on modern .NET with tools such as Mobilize.Net, rewriting as web apps, or replacing VBA with Office Scripts, Power Automate or Python, all in stages while the old system keeps running.
Why Real Visual Basic Depth Protects Revenue and Reduces Risk
- System stability where it matters most. Legacy VB applications often sit directly on revenue paths such as quoting, billing and fulfillment. An engineer who understands the runtime, COM registration and data access can fix problems at the root instead of applying patches that create the next outage a few weeks later.
- Faster, safer delivery cycles. Experienced specialists read unfamiliar Visual Basic code quickly, add characterization tests around business rules, and ship changes with confidence. That means fewer emergency rollbacks, shorter fix times for urgent defects, and less time your senior staff spend firefighting systems nobody else understands anymore.
- Lower technical debt over time. Every undocumented macro and unversioned VB6 project adds hidden risk. A strong engineer documents behavior, brings code under version control and removes dead dependencies, so each release leaves the system easier to change and the eventual migration smaller, cheaper and far more predictable.
- A realistic path to modern architecture. Microsoft keeps VB.NET supported on modern .NET but does not evolve it at the pace of C#. Engineers who know both worlds can design a staged move to C#, web applications or SQL Server that scales, without a risky big bang rewrite that stalls operations.
Getting Ready Before You Open the Role
Clarify What You Actually Need From a Visual Basic Specialist
Before you write a job post, decide whether you need someone to maintain, modernize, or replace. Those are three different hires. List every Visual Basic asset you own, from VB6 executables to VBA workbooks and Access databases, note who uses each one, and rank them by business impact. This inventory shapes the seniority you need and tells candidates exactly what they are walking into. If the end goal is a new platform rather than ongoing maintenance, consider pairing the hire with a broader custom software development engagement so the migration and the new build share one plan.
Scope the Systems and Architecture You Are Inheriting
Start with a technical audit of what exists. Count the forms, modules and class files in each VB6 project, list every COM component and ActiveX control, and map the data flows between applications, Office files and databases. Identify which systems touch money, compliance or customers, since those carry the highest risk. Note whether the source code is complete and where it lives, because missing source is common with older Visual Basic projects. This audit tells you whether the job is mostly maintenance, a staged modernization, or a full replacement, and it gives candidates enough context to propose a credible approach during interviews.
Match Seniority to the Stack Around Visual Basic
Seniority depends on risk. A junior developer can fix simple VBA macros, but a production VB6 system with COM dependencies and SQL Server back ends needs a senior engineer who has debugged deployment issues on real Windows fleets. Look at the complementary stack as well. Most modernization work requires strong C# and modern .NET skills, plus SQL Server, Windows deployment and sometimes Power Automate or Python. The ideal VB specialist reads legacy code fluently and writes modern C# just as comfortably, because that combination lets one person both stabilize today's system and design tomorrow's replacement without handoff gaps.
Decide Between In House Hires and a Dedicated Remote Pod
An in house hire makes sense when you have a long term, steady stream of Visual Basic maintenance and want deep institutional knowledge on payroll. The challenge is that experienced VB6 and VBA engineers are scarce, and a single person becomes a new point of failure. A dedicated remote pod spreads that knowledge across several engineers, adds a lead who owns delivery, and scales up for a migration push and down afterward. For most companies facing modernization, a pod with legacy and modern .NET coverage delivers faster and carries less risk than recruiting one specialist alone.
Write a Requirement Profile That Attracts Real Visual Basic Experts
- The technical mission. State plainly whether the role is about maintenance, modernization or replacement, and name the systems involved. Strong candidates want to know if they will stabilize a VB6 billing app, migrate VBA workbooks to Power Automate, or convert code to C#. Vague missions attract vague applicants and waste interview time.
- The ecosystem and tooling. List the exact technologies: VB6, VBA, VB.NET, COM components, ActiveX controls, ADO, Access, SQL Server, and any target platform such as modern .NET or web apps. Mention version control, testing and deployment tools too, so candidates can judge fit before they apply and you avoid mismatched expectations.
- Team dynamics. Explain who the engineer will work with: business users who own the workbooks, internal IT handling Windows deployment, and any C# developers building the replacement system. Describe how decisions get made and who signs off on releases. Senior specialists care about ownership and clear communication as much as code.
- System impact. Describe what success looks like in business terms, such as zero unplanned outages in the billing app, every critical workbook under version control, or the first module running on modern .NET. Concrete outcomes help candidates show relevant experience and give you a clear yardstick for performance reviews later.

Let’s Turn Your Idea into Scalable Software
Book a call with the representative to get answers to all the questions you may have.
Finding, Vetting, and Onboarding the Right Engineers
How to Source and Vet Visual Basic Talent Without Guesswork
Choose Sourcing Channels That Surface Proven Specialists
Standard outbound recruiting struggles with Visual Basic roles. Few engineers list VB6 prominently anymore, keyword searches return hobbyists alongside veterans, and job boards attract applicants whose experience stops at a few Excel macros. Recruiters without technical depth cannot tell the difference. Pre vetted talent networks solve this by screening engineers on real legacy projects before you ever see a profile. Working with a partner such as the SoftDoes talent network gives you access to senior engineers with a proven Visual Basic track record, already assessed on COM, data access and migration work, which shortens your search from months to days.
Test Judgment and Skills, Not Just the Resume
A resume listing VB6 says little about real capability. Ask candidates to walk through an architectural choice they made in a legacy system, such as how they isolated COM dependencies or moved Access data to SQL Server. Then run a practical task: give them a short piece of messy Visual Basic code and ask them to explain its business logic, add a characterization test, and outline how they would migrate it to C#. Add a constraint, like keeping the old system live throughout. Finally, assess culture fit by seeing how clearly they explain technical risk to a nontechnical stakeholder.
Onboarding That Gets Visual Basic Engineers Shipping Fast
- Days 1 to 30: access and orientation. Grant repository, database and test environment access on day one, including any VB6 or Office build machines. Walk the engineer through the system inventory and the people who depend on each application. Their goal is a first small fix shipped safely and a written map of the riskiest components.
- Days 31 to 60: stabilization and safety nets. The engineer brings any unversioned code under source control, adds characterization tests around critical business rules, and documents deployment steps for COM components and controls. They should be handling routine defects independently, reducing support tickets, and proposing a prioritized list of improvements and migration candidates.
- Days 61 to 90: ownership and roadmap. By now the engineer owns releases for their area and has delivered at least one meaningful improvement, such as moving an Access database to SQL Server. They present a staged modernization roadmap with clear milestones, risks and effort ranges, so leadership can make funding decisions grounded in real system knowledge.
Choosing With Confidence
Warning Signs and Strong Signals in Visual Basic Interviews
Red flags
- Dismisses legacy code as worthless. A candidate who insists on rewriting everything immediately ignores the business rules buried in old Visual Basic code. That attitude leads to missed requirements, broken processes and expensive rewrites that stall halfway because nobody captured how the original system actually behaved.
- Cannot explain COM or deployment issues. If a candidate goes vague when asked about component registration, ActiveX controls or 32 bit versus 64 bit Office compatibility, they have likely only worked in tidy environments. Real production Visual Basic work lives in exactly those messy details every single week.
- No modern .NET or C# experience. An engineer who only knows VB6 or VBA can keep things running but cannot plan the move forward. Without C# and modern .NET skills, every migration conversation stalls, and you will need to hire again as soon as modernization becomes a priority.
- Skips testing and version control. Candidates who change production macros or VB6 forms directly, with no tests and no source control, put critical workflows at risk. Listen for how they protect business rules before changing code; silence on that topic is a serious warning sign.
Green flags
- Reads unfamiliar code and explains the business logic. Strong candidates quickly turn a confusing VB module into a clear description of what it does for the business. That skill shows they can inherit undocumented systems, ask the right questions, and avoid breaking processes that users silently depend on.
- Talks about staged migration and characterization tests. Senior engineers describe moving functionality in stages while the old system keeps running, with tests locking in current behavior first. That approach signals real modernization experience and an understanding of how to manage risk on systems the business cannot pause.
- Comfortable across VB6, VBA, VB.NET and C#. Candidates who move easily between legacy Visual Basic and modern C# can both maintain today's system and build its replacement. That range reduces handoffs, keeps knowledge in one place, and makes your migration plan far more realistic to execute.
- Knows the modern replacement options. Strong engineers can explain when to convert VB6 with tools like Mobilize.Net, when to rewrite as a web app, and when VBA should become Office Scripts, Power Automate or Python. Practical tradeoff thinking shows they will recommend what fits your business.
Why SoftDoes Is the Partner That Reduces Your Hiring Risk
SoftDoes is a North America focused software engineering and talent delivery partner serving clients across the US and Canada. We give you immediate access to pre vetted senior engineers who know Visual Basic and modern .NET, so stabilization and migration happen under one roof. You get a team delivery model with shared knowledge and a lead who owns outcomes, not isolated freelancers. Replacement and scaling guarantees protect your timeline if needs change. Engagements flex from a single specialist to a full pod, and when the roadmap moves toward C#, you can extend the team with our .NET developers without starting a new search.
Talk to SoftDoes About Your Visual Basic Systems
Your Visual Basic applications and workbooks likely support processes your business cannot afford to lose. Whether you need to stabilize a VB6 system, bring critical VBA automation under control, or plan a staged move to modern .NET, SoftDoes can put the right senior engineers on it quickly. Schedule a discovery call with our team today, share what you are running, and leave with a clear plan, a matched engineer or pod, and realistic next steps.

















































